Paradigm of architecture

Paradigm 1: Phenomenology
Paradigm architectural theory phenomenology is also a philosophy of method. If the paradigm is applied to the whole building, the building will sometimes seem excessive. The development of this theory is as a result of the emergence of criticism related to the e
nvironment. The emphasis of this theory is just estetetika of looks and no meaning in three dimensions.
According to Heidegger's phenomenological terms in which the emphasis is aesthetic and does not depend on the state should be. This paradigm also has something to do with culture. Phenomenology prioritizing the human element than the logic of the architecture. Heidegger issued an opinion because it is driven by a concern to modern people to realize human life.
In our opinion Heidegger's views about the building, the building was not merely fulfill a function, but also convey the expression of feelings pendesainnya. Heidegger's opinion is supported by Christian Norberg through Heidegger's views are his proof.
Selanjutya according to Norberg, architectural phenomenology is an architecture where every space and space has a function. And also the environment around the building, should be reflected in the building. The application of this paradigm requires freedom to the details, purely an idea of ​​the architect. Form of the building is the embodiment of a dream or keininan architect but in the abstract.
Paradigm 2: The Aesthetic of the Sublime
According to the paradigm of aesthetic philosophy is the result of the work of art. In this paradigm, the building not only in terms of fungsionalisnya but also in terms of aesthetics. The first value is seen from the building by Thisis paradigm in terms of aesthetics. According Vedler, beauty is seen as the norm or requirement so we think this paradigm look perfect building if the building was fungsuional and beautiful, not only beautiful but functional.
Paradigm 3: Linguistic Theory
1. Closely related to the meaning and symbols in the world of architecture.
2. Learning how to carry meaning in language and applied sciences through linguistic analogy.
3. Big impact in 1960.
4. It has been applied by Agrset and Gondelson training in theory and those influenced by the language, they find a way semiotic reading architecture as a field of knowledge production, for example: The Urban Text by Gandelsonas.
5. Linking Linguistic Theory - Strukturalism
Strukturalism a learning method which is generally demanded: "things can be said to not have any form of natural or non-natural but constructed from the association between the sign that we have built, and we create.
Structuralist take language as a model and try to build a "grammar".
6. Linking Linguistic Theory - Post-strukturalism
Is a new form of strukturalism born around the 1970s. Looking obyektf but not language as a subject or individual.
If the language strukturalism serve as a model for later coined gramarnya series, it is exactly opposite with post-structuralism which still megunakkan language as the foundation of which is connected to the reader or pendngar through a dialogue or communication language.
7. Linking Linguistic Theory - Dekontruksi
Dekontruksi is part of the postmodern critique which is expected to end the dominance of modern architecture. The aim of philosophy Dekontruksi to put categories, such as creating a form to another form to the contrary, such as present / not present, no / no.
According to the Tschumi, Dekontruksi is a construction that combines the condition of things (elements) of the most traditional and social aspects, which are rearranged stimultan in the most free.
He is interested in violations of discipline, found in architectural context as a limited potential.
Some things that concern architects, if the sign can not be defined, and if the language can not be trusted anymore, whether approval can occur between "language" architecture?

Paradigm 4: Marxism
1. Approach the architectural history and theory of raising the issue of the relationship between class and architecture.
2. Applied in interdisciplinary Focault, where they approach the philosophy, history, and psychology in an attempt to accurately describe the cultural phenomenon found in the social context.
3. Tafuri criticized modern architecture paradigm approach Marxism. He stated that modern architecture does not express the social architecture overview freely without revision of its own elements (language, methods, structure).

Paradigm 5: Feminism
1. Attention within the social democratic in the 1960's marked by gender, race, or sexual differences.
2. With regard to gender as social control, feinisme menggunakkan critical paradigm including post-structuralism, Marxism, and psycoanalysis to analyze. In the history of sex has been used to limit or give signs of something, as in ancient Greece which distinguish columns that are masculine or feminine. Chris Weedon theory suggests this as an authenticity and implications for sex:
Psychoanalisis offers a universal theory of the physical development of the opposite calamine, on the basis of representation (bisexual part of the child) ... it offers a frame work in which the feminine and masculine can be understood as a theory of consciousness, language, and meaning.

You're reading an article about Paradigm of architecture and you can find this article url Paradigm of architecturethis url https://chicabi-uniquearchitecture.blogspot.com/2013/02/paradigm-of-architecture.html. You may distribute or copy this article Paradigm of architecture This is beneficial if you or your friends, but do not forget to put the source link.